On July 27, the Court rejected the request for a rehearing. Such requests are rarely granted, so the ruling was not much of a surprise, and it passed by without much notice. But it was referenced yesterday in a footnote to PRC Order No. 4742, which concerns another costing issue raised by UPS.
The Court’s order provides no explanation why reconsideration was not warranted. The order simply says, “Upon consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is ordered that the petition be denied. Per Curiam.”
Get the news sent straight to your inbox. Please remember, this list sends an email every weekday, so if you are not a news junkie, then this might not be the list for you. Thanks